Vol. 54, No. 3 March 2017 .pdf version
Ed Graney: Passing the gavel
Joe Mitch: Full Court Press will educate
Koenig's social activism is Most Courageous
Cafarelli named Katha Quinn winner
CoSIDA's Kowal named Haverbeck winner
Gardner joining Bleacher Report with Rising Star award
Kentucky, UCLA freshmen named to watch lists
Task force will consider website endorsements

Online Credentialing Task Force will consider website endorsements

Bookmark and Share  

The USBWA's Online Credentialing Task Force was formed nearly two and one-half years ago and already has issued endorsements for 34 websites. These websites, in the opinion of the USBWA, deserve full consideration when applying for credentials to NCAA member institutions' home games, college basketball tournament events and the NCAA tournament.

More from the USBWA:
Credentialing Application
Scholarship Application
Renew your membership

The credentialing task force was set up to identify criteria that would be especially helpful to sports information directors when evaluating sites for the purpose of either granting or denying credential requests.

The task force was comprised initially of reporters from traditional print and online organizations, SIDs and representatives from APSE and the USBWA. The task force agreed that the APSE's statement of ethics guidelines constituted a good model for professional journalism websites to follow.

The intent of the USBWA is two-fold: 1) to provide support for online entities that meet reasonable expectations of professional editorial oversight and adherence to journalistic and ethical standards; and 2) to provide a service and a resource for media coordinators, who can take into account USBWA endorsement when considering a request to grant credentials.

Receiving endorsement from the USBWA does not guarantee that a website will be credentialed, however. NCAA-member institutions and other eventsponsoring organizations retain the sole right to grant or deny credentials.

When reviewing applications from websites for endorsement, the task force thoroughly vets every site and uses the following criteria to judge a website's legitimacy:

Editorial oversight and adherence to journalistic and ethical standards; evaluation of demonstrated proprietary, rather than aggregate, content; experience of staff; scope of coverage; balance of coverage; frequency and consistency of publication.

The task force evaluates websites only and not individuals. Traditional media organizations (newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations or networks) and independent websites should apply for endorsement on behalf of their staff members. Freelancers should apply for accreditation either through or on behalf of the media organization for which they will be covering an event.

Current members of the Online Credentialing Task Force are Randy McClure, Rush the Court and the USBWA's new media liaison; Joe Mitch, USBWA executive director; and Kirk Wessler, Peoria Journal Star and a past president of the USBWA. Chris DiSano, formerly of College Chalktalk, served the first two years on the committee when it began evaluating websites.

For a list of websites endorsed by the USBWA and to apply for endorsement, go to the USBWA's website at usbwa.com and click on the Credentialing Application link.

February 2021
December 2020
June 2020
January 2020
November 2019
May 2019
March 2019
January 2019
November 2018
May 2018
March 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
November 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
November 2015
May 2015
March 2015
January 2015
November 2014
May 2014
March 2014
January 2014
November 2013
May 2013
March 2013
January 2013
November 2012
May 2012
March 2012
January 2012
November 2011
August 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
November 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
November 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
November 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
November 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
November 2006
May 2006
March 2006
January 2006
November 2005
May 2005 (.pdf)
March 2005 (.pdf)
January 2005 (.pdf)
November 2004 (.pdf)
May 2004 (.pdf)
March 2004 (.pdf)
January 2004 (.pdf)
November 2003 (.pdf)
May 2003 (.pdf)
March 2003 (.pdf)
January 2003 (.pdf)
November 2002 (.pdf)
January 2002 (.pdf)
November 2001 (.pdf)